WebMar 10, 2024 · The CIR appealed the CTA Decision to the Court of Appeals, which initially granted the appeal of the CIR but reversed itself and affirming the decision of the CTA. Hence this case. Issue: Whether transaction of sale of a property not in the course of trade or business or “deemed sale” is Subject to VAT. Held: WebSep 22, 2024 · In case of an ailment by a member of the benefits under the agreement, petitioner does not reimburse or indemnify the member as the latter does not pay any third party. Instead, it is the petitioner who pays the participating physicians and other health care providers for the services rendered at pre-agreed rates.
GR No. 153866 CIR vs. Seagate – Pinoy Case Digests
WebOct 15, 2007 · As a rule, courts should avoid issuing a writ of preliminary of certiorari to nullify and set aside the Order of May 4, 2005. injunction which would in effect dispose of the main case as well as the Writ of Preliminary Injunction issued by. without trial. respondent Judge Caguioa on May 11, 2005 is GRANTED. The. WebAcain v. IAC (1987) Facts: On May 1984, Constantino Acain (petitioner hereinafter Acain) filed on the RTC of Cebu City, a petition for the probate of the will of the late Nemesio Acain and for the issuance to Acain of letters testamentary. When Nemesio died, he left a will in which Acain and his siblings were instituted as heirs. solve a math problem with steps
Cir vs. Toshiba Information Equipment (Phils.), Inc.
WebApr 29, 2024 · GR No. 153866 CIR vs. Seagate. FACTS: Respondent is a resident foreign corporation duly registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission to do business in the Philippines and is registered with the Philippine Export Zone Authority (PEZA). The respondent is Value Added Tax-registered entity and filed for the VAT returns. WebG.R. No. 153866 February 11, 2005. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, petitioner, vs. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY (PHILIPPINES), respondent. D E C I S I O N. … WebThe Court of Appeals provided no explanation as to why the admissions of the CIR in his Answer in CTA Case No. 5762 deserved more weight and credence than those he made in the Joint Stipulation. ... supra note 55 at 222-223, citing Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Seagate Technology (Philippines), 491 Phil. 317, 335 (2005). 58 Commissioner ... solve and check 1/x+3 x+10/x-2